It's been a long time (far too long) and I'd really like to get a new release out in the near future. Being able to work from my Macbook will definitely help things along. In the meantime, Phil Feller has done a great job of cleaning up and reorganizing the SWIG scripts that we use to generate the wrappers for Perl, Python, etc. As a consequence, here's how it went.
[njg]~/PDQ% uname -a Darwin NJGs-MacBook.local 9.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.6.0: Mon Nov 24 17:37:00 PST 2008;root:xnu-1228.9.59~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
Let's check out PDQ from SourceForge ...
[njg]~/PDQ% cvs co pdq-qnm-pkg xxxx@pdq-qnm-pkg.cvs.sourceforge.net's password: cvs checkout: Updating pdq-qnm-pkg U pdq-qnm-pkg/COPYRIGHT U pdq-qnm-pkg/Getversion U pdq-qnm-pkg/Makeall U pdq-qnm-pkg/Makefile U pdq-qnm-pkg/README U pdq-qnm-pkg/pdq.i cvs checkout: Updating pdq-qnm-pkg/bin ...
OK. That worked. Now, let's try to make the PDQ lib, as a test ...
[njg]~/PDQ/pdq-qnm-pkg% make ./Makeall ar -rv libpdq.a MVA_Approx.o MVA_Canon.o MVA_Solve.o PDQ_Build.o PDQ_Exact.o PDQ_Globals.o PDQ_MServer.o PDQ_Report.o PDQ_Utils.o r - MVA_Approx.o r - MVA_Canon.o r - MVA_Solve.o r - PDQ_Build.o ...
So far, so good. Let's try to run the new multi-server extension in Perl-PDQ ...
[njg]~/PDQ/pdq-qnm-pkg/examples/MultiServer% ./mm1_test.pl *************************************** ****** Pretty Damn Quick REPORT ******* *************************************** *** of : Thu Jan 29 22:48:24 2009 *** *** for: M/M/1 Comparison *** *** Ver: PDQ Analyzer v4.B 041807 *** *************************************** *************************************** .... Node Sched Resource Workload Class Demand ---- ----- -------- -------- ----- ------ CEN FCFS FIFO Work TRANS 1.0000 1 MSQ Multinode Work TRANS 1.0000 ... Throughput Multinode Work 0.7500 Requests/Seconds Utilization Multinode Work 75.0000 Percent Queue length Multinode Work 3.0000 Requests Waiting line Multinode Work 2.2500 Requests Waiting time Multinode Work 3.0000 Seconds Residence time Multinode Work 4.0000 Seconds
This proves that the new MSQ tag was understood correctly. We are well on our way by the looks of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment