tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6977755959349847093.post5667064181063783388..comments2024-03-01T21:53:15.921-08:00Comments on The Pith of Performance: PDQ 6.0 is On Its WayNeil Guntherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11441377418482735926noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6977755959349847093.post-10524776165571481562012-12-02T15:58:10.856-08:002012-12-02T15:58:10.856-08:00Dirk Eddelbuettel, an author and maintainer of the...Dirk Eddelbuettel, an author and maintainer of the Rccp package, expressed a concern that the wording in my original post had unfairly implicated Rccp as the culprit preventing PDQ-R from being accepted on CRAN. It certainly was not my intention to cast aspersions on Rccp, and no one else who reviewed my draft <br />saw it that way either; especially since Rccp has never been tried with PDQ. In any case, any unfortunate misinterpretations can mostly be attributed to excessive brevity on my part. Hopefully, the expanded Motivation section now delineates the PDQ issues more clearly.Neil Guntherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11441377418482735926noreply@blogger.com